🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.